+15
NFO_Steve
Rookie
KyleW
mystie
Baseh
Fuck
5olaaar
★Sonι¢ζ☆
Kayla;
TK64
Veil
BlackMagic
Larrsauce
Philip
Boshi
19 posters
[W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
NFO_Steve- Posts : 14
Join date : 2013-03-01
Age : 32
Location : Germany
- Post n°26
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Congratz AC
5olaaar- Posts : 128
Join date : 2012-11-05
Location : macka's bogan village
- Post n°27
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
TK, your TOTALLY wrong.
What won us IL wasn't the 3 dc's, or the 8th race vs NFO, or the top 5 vs ct, OR the 1st race of IL.
It was...
OR MAYBE OUR SUICIDE BAGGER?
(ADD COLOUR FOR FUN AT TARGET, ADD COLOUR FOR FUN) ..!
mystie- Posts : 22
Join date : 2013-02-02
- Post n°28
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Implying that you would have won the race by that much in the first place rofl.. And saying that we didn't play fair (LOL)we were just following the IL rules therefore it was perfectly fair you 'foolish child'
mystie- Posts : 22
Join date : 2013-02-02
- Post n°29
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Also we did reschedule twice actually, the war was post pined by about 2 and a half hours and then they just us th okay to play 4v5 we didn't ask them to do that they wanted to so stop blaming that on us.. Just being sore lol
Senap- Posts : 33
Join date : 2012-06-10
- Post n°30
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
1 season = 10 wars = 30 GPs = 120 races
1 race = 0,83 % of the whole season.
The idea of 1 race ruining the season is ridiculous in my opinion. You had 119 other races where you could have made up for this one lost race.
Same as the "bad lineup"-excuse, but I hope this was just bad trolling, because if you think you're the only one having lineup problems or think that you deserve a division win because you have theoretically the best lineup, then you can't be helped.
1 race = 0,83 % of the whole season.
The idea of 1 race ruining the season is ridiculous in my opinion. You had 119 other races where you could have made up for this one lost race.
Same as the "bad lineup"-excuse, but I hope this was just bad trolling, because if you think you're the only one having lineup problems or think that you deserve a division win because you have theoretically the best lineup, then you can't be helped.
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°31
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Senap wrote:
The idea of 1 race ruining the season is ridiculous in my opinion.
you obviously dont understand +/- then
Toasty- Posts : 71
Join date : 2012-09-03
- Post n°32
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
One of the six clans here really wanted to win this division overall. Like, really bad. I wonder who it is/was...
ac pulled a NFO (back in the WCL days), but they still kept up their game and won it, good job. (:
ac pulled a NFO (back in the WCL days), but they still kept up their game and won it, good job. (:
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°33
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
i guess pointing out a flaw in the rules means i wanted to win the division really badly
Toasty- Posts : 71
Join date : 2012-09-03
- Post n°34
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
This game is a giant flaw, so what.
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°35
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
touché
Toasty- Posts : 71
Join date : 2012-09-03
- Post n°36
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
#winnungargument2013
It's just that I seriously don't get the fuss throughout the last two pages.. xD
It's just that I seriously don't get the fuss throughout the last two pages.. xD
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°37
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
me trying to justify why we lost because i have a huge ego and mystie throwing insults in response because he's insecure
Baseh- Posts : 264
Join date : 2012-05-22
Age : 26
Location : Australia
- Post n°38
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
ac got DC'd during wars this season, don't worry, this also happened to every other clan.
ac got lagged several time during the season, just like every other clan.
ac followed the DC rules, just like every clan should, it isn't our fault we won and that you dc'd on rMR.
And as someone else said previously (I forgot his name) you had 119 other races to catch up from that DC. Maybe you should've taken them, but sometimes the other team suicide bags, or even out plays you and wins. I think wZ doesn't want to admit to anything that I just said.
And TK sad he didn't MVP and MiiWii from ac did ;( i cri every tiem
ac got lagged several time during the season, just like every other clan.
ac followed the DC rules, just like every clan should, it isn't our fault we won and that you dc'd on rMR.
And as someone else said previously (I forgot his name) you had 119 other races to catch up from that DC. Maybe you should've taken them, but sometimes the other team suicide bags, or even out plays you and wins. I think wZ doesn't want to admit to anything that I just said.
And TK sad he didn't MVP and MiiWii from ac did ;( i cri every tiem
Rookie- Posts : 290
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 27
- Post n°39
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
I don't think he cares about not mvping, he's already done that plenty of times. The teams more important too,
Rookie- Posts : 290
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 27
- Post n°40
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Senap wrote:1 season = 10 wars = 30 GPs = 120 races
1 race = 0,83 % of the whole season.
The idea of 1 race ruining the season is ridiculous in my opinion. You had 119 other races where you could have made up for this one lost race.
Same as the "bad lineup"-excuse, but I hope this was just bad trolling, because if you think you're the only one having lineup problems or think that you deserve a division win because you have theoretically the best lineup, then you can't be helped.
Sorry but your math is irrelevant in this case. A single race can cost up to 82 points, if for say a whole team d/c'd with top 5 at the end, they would get bottom 5 on that race instead of the top 5 they deserve, so they would have a -41 race instead of a -41, a 82 point difference. This 82 point gap would be about 15% of 500 +/- points, much more than ".083%" Also,+/- effect is doubled when playing the main clan you competing against head on head, as for every +/- point you lose they will gain (so divide the 40 point ago between ac and wZ and make it 20), which means 1 race in a wZ-ac war with 3 d/cs is actually critical. It's all set in the stone now though. Congrats to the division win ac. Sorry bout double post too
Yoshter- Posts : 37
Join date : 2013-01-19
- Post n°41
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
#Div.4 for the most amount of posts?
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°42
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
it's gonna be alright
5olaaar- Posts : 128
Join date : 2012-11-05
Location : macka's bogan village
- Post n°43
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
i agree with SENAP...................
ZRake- Posts : 46
Join date : 2012-10-21
- Post n°44
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Nice wZ and nice points TK
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°45
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
5olaaar wrote:i agree with SENAP...................
Take this as you will:
- Spoiler:
mystie- Posts : 22
Join date : 2013-02-02
- Post n°46
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
There is no flaw in the rule TK facepalm... the reason why it says both teams must dc is because otherwise any team could replay any race they wanted just by asking three of their members to reset their wii's, blaming it on a mass dc... And with your instance for example, if 1 or 2 players d/c'd you could just ask another to reset their wii and blame it on a 'mass dc'... Not saying you did or didnt, but only having a 'mass dc' for one team is extremely fishy, hence why the rule states 'both teams must have at least 2 dc's for the race not to count'.
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°47
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
yeah because our 2nd 3rd and bagger d/c'ing on the 2nd to last turn of raceway lap 3 was definitely on purpose
it doesn't matter at this point, we lost. you won. i'm just saying if proof can be provided that it was a legitimate mass d/c it shouldn't count
it doesn't matter at this point, we lost. you won. i'm just saying if proof can be provided that it was a legitimate mass d/c it shouldn't count
mystie- Posts : 22
Join date : 2013-02-02
- Post n°48
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
are u retarded... i said im not accusing u of doing that but there is no flaw in the rule... also last time you said it was your 2nd 3rd and 4th that d/c'd... i also recall it was half way through the lap, im about to watch my recording.
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°49
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
well if i did say that it was a mistake but i do know that two of our top spots d/c'd
the flaw in the rule is that potentially 5 people from a team could mass d/c and the top 5 for the other team would count. if proof of a mass d/c is provided aka proof that it wasn't an intentional d/c it shouldn't count. whether people d/c'd from both teams or not shouldn't matter.
the flaw in the rule is that potentially 5 people from a team could mass d/c and the top 5 for the other team would count. if proof of a mass d/c is provided aka proof that it wasn't an intentional d/c it shouldn't count. whether people d/c'd from both teams or not shouldn't matter.
|
|