+15
NFO_Steve
Rookie
KyleW
mystie
Baseh
Fuck
5olaaar
★Sonι¢ζ☆
Kayla;
TK64
Veil
BlackMagic
Larrsauce
Philip
Boshi
19 posters
[W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Boshi- Posts : 122
Join date : 2012-07-03
Age : 31
Location : Germany
- Post n°1
[W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Last edited by Boshi on Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:05 pm; edited 2 times in total
Philip- Posts : 169
Join date : 2012-05-28
Age : 26
Location : Georgia, USA
Nice win, Wollywogz.
Larrsauce- Posts : 546
Join date : 2012-05-18
Age : 26
Location : Canada
ggs atleast we get third now
BlackMagic- Posts : 438
Join date : 2012-05-14
Age : 30
NFO
hahaha, i was right. TK has mvp'd the division.
hahaha, i was right. TK has mvp'd the division.
Last edited by BlackMagic on Sun Apr 07, 2013 4:58 pm; edited 1 time in total
Boshi- Posts : 122
Join date : 2012-07-03
Age : 31
Location : Germany
Larrsauce wrote:ggs atleast we get third now
We are still third, ct vs NFO2 is missing in the table atm. :p
Veil- Posts : 437
Join date : 2012-10-23
Age : 24
Location : Singapore
TK
Larrsauce- Posts : 546
Join date : 2012-05-18
Age : 26
Location : Canada
Boshi wrote:Larrsauce wrote:ggs atleast we get third now
We are still third, ct vs NFO2 is missing in the table atm. :p
pshit
fk forget about that yea i spoke too soon either way im happy nice job ke3eping it close nof
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
we lose IL because of Ct throw + mass d/c race counting vs ac
GAMES
GAMES
Kayla;- Posts : 118
Join date : 2012-10-16
Age : 24
I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT YES YES YES YES YES YES YES TK-SIXTY-FUCKING-FOUR HAS DONE IT AGAIN.
Larrsauce- Posts : 546
Join date : 2012-05-18
Age : 26
Location : Canada
- Post n°10
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
excuses have no uses
★Sonι¢ζ☆- Posts : 503
Join date : 2012-05-17
Location : Darkness of my heart
- Post n°11
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Nice win wZ, TK
5olaaar- Posts : 128
Join date : 2012-11-05
Location : macka's bogan village
- Post n°12
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
u MAD bro
Fuck- Posts : 7
Join date : 2013-04-05
- Post n°13
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
wZ for first season 5
Baseh- Posts : 264
Join date : 2012-05-22
Age : 26
Location : Australia
- Post n°14
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
TK64 wrote:we lose IL because of Ct throw + mass d/c race counting vs ac
GAMES
It's not like everything went perfect for us and everything was hell for you.
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°15
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Baseh wrote:TK64 wrote:we lose IL because of Ct throw + mass d/c race counting vs ac
GAMES
It's not like everything went perfect for us and everything was hell for you.
pretty much
mystie- Posts : 22
Join date : 2013-02-02
- Post n°16
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Who said Ct threw the war lol, we just outplayed them and probably would have won by that much anyway... And if you want to use LU as an excuse ac haven't even used their strongest LU all season because of time zones compared to wz using their strongest every week lol... How's the Dodge tk?
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°17
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
You foolish child. If wZ would have used their best LU each week, we would have went 10-0. First war vs BY was a clusterfuck last minute whipped up shit hence why we had to keep subbing people out because of people having to go and such, and our lineup vs you was not our best and we only bagged for about half the war which obviously was a mistake considering what happened...
Our 2nd match against you speaks for itself. And that happened when a race counted where 3 of us d/c'd.
Our 2nd match against you speaks for itself. And that happened when a race counted where 3 of us d/c'd.
KyleW- Posts : 44
Join date : 2012-05-14
- Post n°18
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
wz is by far the best clan in the world. it's composed solely of only the best players. we have a lineup of all d1 players that are choosing to play with their friends rather with their clans. if we used our best LU every week tk would have a 20 point average. we use scum of the world like ryan parker and riley bellamy on the regular. if you think we're anything less than the best than your mother snorted only the finest cocaine during her pregnancy. ggs for your illegitimate division 4 first place you should be so fucking happy LOL
mystie- Posts : 22
Join date : 2013-02-02
- Post n°19
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Our 2nd war against you we were in the exact same boat... I wasn't even supposed to play at all, had just woken up and was told to sub, the war was a mess, half of the LU had other things to do and didn't even want to play and it was a Sunday morning (hangover central).. I can't believe how arrogant you are being with these ridiculous excuses, regardless we won GJ ac!!!!
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°20
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
a race where there's a mass d/c costing us the div win because of +/- isn't an "excuse" it's a legitimate problem with the d/c rule
regardless both teams get promoted so w/e, enjoy your banner
regardless both teams get promoted so w/e, enjoy your banner
5olaaar- Posts : 128
Join date : 2012-11-05
Location : macka's bogan village
- Post n°21
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
THANK.
Rookie- Posts : 290
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 27
- Post n°22
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
NFO4banner
mystie- Posts : 22
Join date : 2013-02-02
- Post n°23
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
Well... even if we redid the race you still wouldn't have won anyway because we won the division by 50pts... Also if you're going to use that as an excuse I d/c'd in the war against Ct final race on Daisy circuit when i had already placed 3rd, resulting in a 10th place... the same thing happened for Macka he dc'd in first on gv2 final race resulting in last.. and I also got lagged from an obvious 3rd to 7th against ct too... so what you're saying is completely pointless we deserve the win more than you guys, you're excuses don't make sense and you're just too sore to admit it so get a life TK rofl.. gg's
Rookie- Posts : 290
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 27
- Post n°24
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
One race easily could effect a +/- difference of 50 actually, if wZ lost that race by like 35 when it was possible for them to win it by 20, that would be 55 points right there so it is possible, but yes somewhat unlikely.
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°25
Re: [W10] WollywogZ 332 vs. 304 Nferno 2
mystie wrote:Well... even if we redid the race you still wouldn't have won anyway because we won the division by 50pts... Also if you're going to use that as an excuse I d/c'd in the war against Ct final race on Daisy circuit when i had already placed 3rd, resulting in a 10th place... the same thing happened for Macka he dc'd in first on gv2 final race resulting in last.. and I also got lagged from an obvious 3rd to 7th against ct too... so what you're saying is completely pointless we deserve the win more than you guys, you're excuses don't make sense and you're just too sore to admit it so get a life TK rofl.. gg's
Only insecure kids use the phrase "get a life" but judging by your attitude that's right up your alley. If you want to think you deserved the division win that's laughable but expected, see you next season.
and what Rookie said. You won the division by 40 points, not 50, so that race was actually extremely important because what would have probably been something around a +10-20 race for us ended up being something like a -20 race. Had a replay of the race happened (which should have happened had you guys played fair, by the way) we could have a had a big win and if that was the case we would have won the division.
Also, you should be used to spot lag at this point considering you're australian. You have no idea how many times combined we got lagged in the two times we faced you this season. It's just a factor in USA vs AUS wars.
Also you couldn't have gotten 10th instead of 3rd when you d/c'd vs Ct considering you played them 5v4 instead of rescheduling.
|
|