Division 4 Fixtures/Standings

A little bit late but well had to do some things --> W3 Update :3

One question tobi, i was winning Tigre the last week
And in this week i did 116 and Tigre 81
How is he first? oh my god xDDD

Tigre got 81 in two gps

yeah but tigre have only 8/9 gps , and rubenD 9/9

so? The average is the amount of points divided by the number of GPs.

Yes
For example 250 Pts. in 5 GP's = Average of 50 Pts.

What happened to Avail vs Debilitate ?

If they dont post, put 100-100 or 0-0 or anything, idk but that war should be posted for update:/

That war is being played this weekend I believe.

ok just post the results ^^
Gonna wait until 09.12.2012

tobtheking2 wrote:What happened to Avail vs Debilitate ?

I PM'd you on Skype about our reschedule... you already forgot?

Jeah I forgot ^^
Haha sorry my Memories are fucked up atm

Gute Arbeit Tobi

Updated W4 ~~~

Funny how we've just about tripled W-K's points, but they're still "beating" us...

i retweeted that ^

I believe it's if two teams score within 20 points of each other a bonus point is rewarded? Tbh, I don't even know why the bonus point system is there. I would assume in case there is a tie between two or more teams? While I could see that as being somewhat of a solution, I also see it as potentially being a huge problem. Like Leon said, Avail currently has more points than W-K, yet we are still behind in placement. This only makes me believe that the whole placement table is 100% dependent on the bonus points; and the actual points scored by the players don't matter at all, which imo is awful. Hypothetically, a team could completely dominate and win every war by 100+, and end up losing to teams who won only due to having an even match.

so I want to continue watching my Anime hehe^^
Updated W5

rubend :makeup:
see u doeuf :p

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Its Qaz 7, not Quaz
LOL

Gatlin wrote:I believe it's if two teams score within 20 points of each other a bonus point is rewarded? Tbh, I don't even know why the bonus point system is there. I would assume in case there is a tie between two or more teams? While I could see that as being somewhat of a solution, I also see it as potentially being a huge problem. Like Leon said, Avail currently has more points than W-K, yet we are still behind in placement. This only makes me believe that the whole placement table is 100% dependent on the bonus points; and the actual points scored by the players don't matter at all, which imo is awful. Hypothetically, a team could completely dominate and win every war by 100+, and end up losing to teams who won only due to having an even match.

There's nothing wrong with the bonus point system. It's like having an overtime loss in hockey. Both teams played really close so the one walks away with a little something. +/- is still really important because if you are tied in over points it's what matters. The fact that WK has less +/- and more points just shows that they are more consistent in their playing.

Your teams one loss is also to WK without getting a bonus point so you can really only blame yourselves for not being in first since you had the power to be in the top spot but gave it to WK instead. That's at least how I look it.

★Sonι¢ζ☆ wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Its Qaz 7, not Quaz
LOL

Oh rly ?
My bad, will be changed W6

Ok thanks

Bounty wrote:



Your teams one loss is also to WK without getting a bonus point so you can really only blame yourselves for not being in first since you had the power to be in the top spot but gave it to WK instead. That's at least how I look it.

Exactly what I wanted to say. Of course W-K should theoretically be ahead of you if you have the same record, even without bonus points, because head to head, they proved to be better than you guys half way through.

Updated W6!