International League Forums

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

+5
BenDK
CHEE2E12
cho2
Suppar!
Ste_K_
9 posters

    [W2] n§» 296 - 268 TL

    avatar
    Ste_K_


    Posts : 23
    Join date : 2012-05-28

    [W2] n§» 296  -  268 TL Empty [W2] n§» 296 - 268 TL

    Post by Ste_K_ Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:38 pm

    Team Luxembourg 268 vs 296 No Surrender


    GP1

    Spoiler:


    GP2

    Spoiler:


    GP3

    Spoiler:



    Table


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    Suppar!
    Suppar!


    Posts : 149
    Join date : 2012-05-15
    Location : Milan

    [W2] n§» 296  -  268 TL Empty Re: [W2] n§» 296 - 268 TL

    Post by Suppar! Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:40 pm

    Oli THE GOAT Like a Star @ heaven
    cho2
    cho2


    Posts : 35
    Join date : 2012-06-05

    [W2] n§» 296  -  268 TL Empty Re: [W2] n§» 296 - 268 TL

    Post by cho2 Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:56 pm

    Looked like a close war. Nice win nS.
    CHEE2E12
    CHEE2E12


    Posts : 273
    Join date : 2012-05-19

    [W2] n§» 296  -  268 TL Empty Re: [W2] n§» 296 - 268 TL

    Post by CHEE2E12 Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:05 pm

    Well done guys! Olifre cherry
    BenDK
    BenDK


    Posts : 38
    Join date : 2012-05-18
    Age : 31
    Location : Colmar-Berg

    [W2] n§» 296  -  268 TL Empty Re: [W2] n§» 296 - 268 TL

    Post by BenDK Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:33 pm

    What about something like?
    ''n$ did not have enough players, so TL was so fair to play a 4on4''
    or
    ''thanks @TL for playing a 4on4''
    hm?

    nah, the only fact here is the win, fairplay will be punished everytime...

    anyways a close result, and for TL a good result.
    ggs n§.
    Baseh
    Baseh


    Posts : 264
    Join date : 2012-05-22
    Age : 26
    Location : Australia

    [W2] n§» 296  -  268 TL Empty Re: [W2] n§» 296 - 268 TL

    Post by Baseh Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:31 am

    BenDK wrote:What about something like?
    ''n$ did not have enough players, so TL was so fair to play a 4on4''
    or
    ''thanks @TL for playing a 4on4''
    hm?

    nah, the only fact here is the win, fairplay will be punished everytime...

    anyways a close result, and for TL a good result.
    ggs n§.

    Wish GP7 were as nice as you guys ._.
    Max
    Max


    Posts : 73
    Join date : 2012-05-15

    [W2] n§» 296  -  268 TL Empty Re: [W2] n§» 296 - 268 TL

    Post by Max Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:39 am

    Nice one, n§ cheers
    Fabe
    Fabe


    Posts : 145
    Join date : 2012-05-13
    Location : Belgium

    [W2] n§» 296  -  268 TL Empty Re: [W2] n§» 296 - 268 TL

    Post by Fabe Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:48 am

    BenDK wrote:What about something like?
    ''n$ did not have enough players, so TL was so fair to play a 4on4''
    or
    ''thanks @TL for playing a 4on4''
    hm?

    nah, the only fact here is the win, fairplay will be punished everytime...

    anyways a close result, and for TL a good result.
    ggs n§.

    David and Suppar are ns2, they probably didn't know why this was played as a 4v4 (I didn't know either), it could have been TL that had only 4 or whatever, let me say now thanks TL for accepting to play a 4v4, ns1 isn't active on this website, they just post results and that's it, so that's why it wasn't mentioned.

    ggs

    avatar
    Indii


    Posts : 18
    Join date : 2012-09-02

    [W2] n§» 296  -  268 TL Empty Re: [W2] n§» 296 - 268 TL

    Post by Indii Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:12 am

    Thanks for the 4on4 Wink

    Sponsored content


    [W2] n§» 296  -  268 TL Empty Re: [W2] n§» 296 - 268 TL

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun May 19, 2024 8:49 pm