International League Forums

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

+10
Rookie
adam
SuperTorn
Danov
Fabe
TK64
Joe
CHEE2E12
BlackMagic
Boomeh
14 posters

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Boomeh
    Boomeh


    Posts : 20
    Join date : 2012-05-28
    Location : Boomeh's Romp Room

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Boomeh Sun Jul 15, 2012 5:45 pm

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 TrollMario


    First, Let's just take care of the results pending penalties..


    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Scores


    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Gdrgh43



    Now.. nS2 used 2 unregistered players. After making us wait for over an hour to add the host and get this going 1 of those players just posted to joined nS2 in IL here at 3:04pm: https://ilforums.forumotion.com/t530-njoe-s-registration

    Rocore just posted yesterday and has not been accepted either here: https://ilforums.forumotion.com/t525-nrocore

    Both of the players points have been redacted from the final results...




    FINAL RESULTS


    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 RealResultsnS2


    and Here is some pics from them holding us up for over an hour, the FC's from them as well as some shots from them added on the roster. GGs.



    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 A7vsnS2WarStuff01


    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 A7vsnS2WarStuff02


    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Unreg1


    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Unreg2
    BlackMagic
    BlackMagic


    Posts : 438
    Join date : 2012-05-14
    Age : 30

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by BlackMagic Sun Jul 15, 2012 5:52 pm

    n§»Rocore won't be getting registered anytime soon. n§»Joe, when he gave his fc, he wasn't even registered for the team, and while we were waiting for them to join the room, Joe created a thread for his registration (he wouldn't have been able to play too b/c registration is closed on sunday unless permission is given). No permission was given from A7 to allow nS to use these players. We've been giving a little grace with player registration, but this is only when both teams agree to use the player. For example, in Doeuf's match last week, they used an unregistered player; however, both teams agreed to allow Doeuf to use this player. That's what you should have done nS. That is why you're getting penalized.

    I don't like working registration in my division because I dont want to seem bias. But this is what would have happened either way.
    Boomeh
    Boomeh


    Posts : 20
    Join date : 2012-05-28
    Location : Boomeh's Romp Room

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Boomeh Sun Jul 15, 2012 5:54 pm

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Tumblr_m3d6hqotQ71qh5lrdo1_500
    CHEE2E12
    CHEE2E12


    Posts : 273
    Join date : 2012-05-19

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by CHEE2E12 Sun Jul 15, 2012 5:55 pm

    (makeup)
    avatar
    Joe


    Posts : 3
    Join date : 2012-07-15

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Joe Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:00 pm

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 RealResultsnS2

    MY NAME ISN'T INDI. GET IT RIGHT. CAN YOU NOT READ? IT'S INDIHJK.
    Boomeh
    Boomeh


    Posts : 20
    Join date : 2012-05-28
    Location : Boomeh's Romp Room

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Boomeh Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:01 pm

    Dilligaf?

    But thanks for the input Ma'am.
    CHEE2E12
    CHEE2E12


    Posts : 273
    Join date : 2012-05-19

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by CHEE2E12 Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:02 pm

    Boomeh can we exchange FCs xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    TK64
    TK64


    Posts : 522
    Join date : 2012-05-13
    Age : 28
    Location : Washington

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by TK64 Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:02 pm

    gee no obvious alts here
    BlackMagic
    BlackMagic


    Posts : 438
    Join date : 2012-05-14
    Age : 30

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by BlackMagic Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:03 pm

    TK64 wrote:gee no obvious alts here
    Obviously
    Fabe
    Fabe


    Posts : 145
    Join date : 2012-05-13
    Location : Belgium

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Fabe Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:03 pm

    Sad
    avatar
    Joe


    Posts : 3
    Join date : 2012-07-15

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Joe Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:03 pm

    omg who let tk in here? creasing atm
    Danov
    Danov


    Posts : 132
    Join date : 2012-06-06
    Age : 28
    Location : United Kingdom

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Danov Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:07 pm

    Well done nS Smile Shame A7 had to be such jerks about it Sad
    CHEE2E12
    CHEE2E12


    Posts : 273
    Join date : 2012-05-19

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by CHEE2E12 Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:08 pm

    [iS] Jerks?
    BlackMagic
    BlackMagic


    Posts : 438
    Join date : 2012-05-14
    Age : 30

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by BlackMagic Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:09 pm

    Danov wrote:Well done nS Smile Shame A7 had to be such jerks about it Sad
    only jerks cause David didn't share his makeup with us. Sad
    Boomeh
    Boomeh


    Posts : 20
    Join date : 2012-05-28
    Location : Boomeh's Romp Room

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Boomeh Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:09 pm

    Danov wrote:Well done nS Smile Shame A7 had to be such jerks about it Sad

    Bish plz don't even try 2 lie, Who doesn't love a good jerk every now and then?
    SuperTorn
    SuperTorn


    Posts : 109
    Join date : 2012-05-15
    Age : 26
    Location : Manati, Puerto Rico

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by SuperTorn Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:09 pm

    WTF NS NO SKILL MAN WTF NO SKILL NO REGISTERED FCS ALL FULL ALT CLAN WOW WTF DUDE WTF NO SKILL WTF ROB HACK WTF NO SWAG MAN WTF
    CHEE2E12
    CHEE2E12


    Posts : 273
    Join date : 2012-05-19

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by CHEE2E12 Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:10 pm

    You, sir, are absolutely hilarious!
    avatar
    adam


    Posts : 8
    Join date : 2012-06-22

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by adam Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:12 pm

    David want to cam?
    Danov
    Danov


    Posts : 132
    Join date : 2012-06-06
    Age : 28
    Location : United Kingdom

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Danov Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:20 pm

    He probably would once you get rid of your mop haircut Sad
    avatar
    adam


    Posts : 8
    Join date : 2012-06-22

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by adam Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:25 pm

    I had it cut last week. :3
    Danov
    Danov


    Posts : 132
    Join date : 2012-06-06
    Age : 28
    Location : United Kingdom

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Danov Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:26 pm

    cute
    Fabe
    Fabe


    Posts : 145
    Join date : 2012-05-13
    Location : Belgium

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Fabe Sun Jul 15, 2012 6:32 pm

    too bad I wasn't here, A7 had no chanse if so Smile
    Rookie
    Rookie


    Posts : 290
    Join date : 2012-05-10
    Age : 28

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Rookie Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:30 pm

    I thought no allies was a rule as well and I thought Inviso was in Imperious
    avatar
    Rob


    Posts : 3
    Join date : 2012-05-15

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Rob Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:49 am

    ggs next time ill 180
    avatar
    Hugo


    Posts : 4
    Join date : 2012-05-29

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Hugo Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:51 am

    Rookie wrote:I thought no allies was a rule as well and I thought Inviso was in Imperious
    Imperious dropped out of IL.

    Sponsored content


    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:34 pm