IMO that's what division admins are here for, to make decisions on things like this that aren't clearly outlined in the rules. Otherwise we would be useless and they could just call us the Table Update People.
+25
Larrsauce
Bounty
Swag
AL12
dvgeorge
~PK~
Macka99
zexy
weepers leave japes.
Phil
Mecha
CHEE2E12
mattie2710
nSindi
Dugo
Suppar!
Baseh
Veil
Mywo
TK64
NFO_Steve
Danov
5olaaar
Lakitu
Fabe
29 posters
[W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
Tweek- Posts : 167
Join date : 2012-05-10
- Post n°52
Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
Yes but I won't accept a 11 races war, they don't want to count GV race cause ac got top4 by glitching. What I would really like to see is a redone GP3 with no trolling or glitching but both teams would have to agree with it and since ac don't really care I don't think it would happen.
Brian- Posts : 172
Join date : 2013-01-19
Age : 64
Location : dsdf
- Post n°53
Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
I think the glitching penalty should come from the players' individual score, so that stuff like this won't happen (glitch on GV and get 15pts for your individuals for free), just my thoughts.
Phil- Posts : 197
Join date : 2012-07-29
Age : 73
- Post n°54
Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
To be honest, I expected and still are expecting the DQ of ac.
It's one thing not to take IL wars serious and having fun in IL. It's another to imbalance a whole season (by shifting the +/- to a max.) because of ac's goofy behaviour in this war. In addition to their constant need to reschedule every match.
f. Teams who are unable to war on the scheduled date/time twice or more during a season may be disqualified or replaced for the following season.
Ac's themselves and IL staff really should rethink if this league still is the right place for them. To me, reliability is a must-have for every participating team. And it really hurts to see a team who thinks they can screw around with their opponents by rescheduling every war to their advantage. And then fuck around with them during the match, while other teams struggle to have five players on sunday on their set time to give their oponnents a good challenge.
It's one thing not to take IL wars serious and having fun in IL. It's another to imbalance a whole season (by shifting the +/- to a max.) because of ac's goofy behaviour in this war. In addition to their constant need to reschedule every match.
f. Teams who are unable to war on the scheduled date/time twice or more during a season may be disqualified or replaced for the following season.
Ac's themselves and IL staff really should rethink if this league still is the right place for them. To me, reliability is a must-have for every participating team. And it really hurts to see a team who thinks they can screw around with their opponents by rescheduling every war to their advantage. And then fuck around with them during the match, while other teams struggle to have five players on sunday on their set time to give their oponnents a good challenge.
Fabe- Posts : 145
Join date : 2012-05-13
Location : Belgium
- Post n°55
Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
Tweek wrote:Yes but I won't accept a 11 races war, they don't want to count GV race cause ac got top4 by glitching. What I would really like to see is a redone GP3 with no trolling or glitching but both teams would have to agree with it and since ac don't really care I don't think it would happen.
After the GV race we resetted and played 3 races (the final 3 from gp1, where bc64 is the first race of that gp), we played 12 races in total, 13 if you count the GV, my table is all results without the GV race, ac's table is with the GV race and not the MG. Sorry but we're not redoing the third gp, leave it like it is then, with ac's table.
I honestly thought using my table was the best thing to do, for everyone, now with this +/-, if we ever tie, perhaps for the division title, we win no doubt with those scores, and that only cause of counting a glitched race.
~vooky~- Posts : 255
Join date : 2012-05-14
Age : 27
Location : Germany
- Post n°56
Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
WCL > IL
Tweek- Posts : 167
Join date : 2012-05-10
- Post n°57
[W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
I asked if 13 races were played and you said no, I already wanted to do that but thought only 12 had been played. I'll have to count an easy 5v2 race but it'll be for the best.
I'll edit topic but I'll update tables later.
Edit: Done.
I'll edit topic but I'll update tables later.
Edit: Done.
5olaaar- Posts : 128
Join date : 2012-11-05
Location : macka's bogan village
- Post n°58
Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
umad phil
xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
5olaaar- Posts : 128
Join date : 2012-11-05
Location : macka's bogan village
- Post n°59
Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
oh yea, i don't think we care about our individuals.
we donate all our points to av.
we donate all our points to av.
Veil- Posts : 437
Join date : 2012-10-23
Age : 24
Location : Singapore
- Post n°60
Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
Phil definitely have a point there.
Brian- Posts : 172
Join date : 2013-01-19
Age : 64
Location : dsdf
- Post n°61
Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
Just don't agree to reschedule with them anymore. If they can't play at normal match time, take the free-win. Their attitude is poor enough.
5olaaar- Posts : 128
Join date : 2012-11-05
Location : macka's bogan village
- Post n°62
Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac
bump
|
|