International League Forums

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

+10
Rookie
adam
SuperTorn
Danov
Fabe
TK64
Joe
CHEE2E12
BlackMagic
Boomeh
14 posters

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Suppar!
    Suppar!


    Posts : 149
    Join date : 2012-05-15
    Location : Milan

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 - Page 2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Suppar! Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:33 pm

    lol.
    avatar
    inviso


    Posts : 10
    Join date : 2012-05-29

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 - Page 2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by inviso Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:08 pm

    Rookie wrote:I thought no allies was a rule as well and I thought Inviso was in Imperious
    This is like the 5th time I'm hearing people go on about this Neutral It's getting annoying as balls.

    I've been in A7 as a member (not an ally) longer than I've been in Imperious. They used to go by The Order. I was going to do WCL with them but then it died, and did IL with them to fulfill the promise that I had made to do WCL with them. A7 is a sub-clan. As Hugo stated, Imperious dropped out of IL (nor did I ever sign up with Imperious for IL). I don't see why this is STILL an issue for some people.
    Rookie
    Rookie


    Posts : 290
    Join date : 2012-05-10
    Age : 27

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 - Page 2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Rookie Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:25 pm

    inviso wrote:
    Rookie wrote:I thought no allies was a rule as well and I thought Inviso was in Imperious
    This is like the 5th time I'm hearing people go on about this Neutral It's getting annoying as balls.

    I've been in A7 as a member (not an ally) longer than I've been in Imperious. They used to go by The Order. I was going to do WCL with them but then it died, and did IL with them to fulfill the promise that I had made to do WCL with them. A7 is a sub-clan. As Hugo stated, Imperious dropped out of IL (nor did I ever sign up with Imperious for IL). I don't see why this is STILL an issue for some people.

    Thanks for clarifying Razz
    Fabe
    Fabe


    Posts : 145
    Join date : 2012-05-13
    Location : Belgium

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 - Page 2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Fabe Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:20 pm

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 - Page 2 1318369988001
    CHEE2E12
    CHEE2E12


    Posts : 273
    Join date : 2012-05-19

    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 - Page 2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by CHEE2E12 Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:48 pm

    Rookie wrote:I thought no allies was a rule as well and I thought Inviso was in Imperious

    I thought using advantageous textures were not allowed, but that rule has also been broken!

    Sponsored content


    [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2 - Page 2 Empty Re: [W4] A7 386 vs 202 nS2

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu May 02, 2024 1:14 am