+25
Swag
Fw Monk
TK64
Mecha
Smile
Larrsauce
Hawk
T11FearZ
waLuigi me
Beat5
Zero
BlackMagic
yasha
Necrosky
tobtheking2
Netsky
~vooky~
Tricks
Smoke
norwaytm
Kamek
Thomas
Fasuke
Crash
Tweek
29 posters
[W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
T11FearZ- Posts : 169
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 29
Location : Florida, USA
- Post n°26
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
Also, I'll need either startup confirmation for HerisS or a video from him.
Thomas- Posts : 163
Join date : 2012-05-15
Age : 28
Location : France
- Post n°27
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
Hawk watched it, I told him by pm to confirm, I'll send you the quote if he doesn't tell it here
Hawk- Posts : 37
Join date : 2012-05-12
Age : 28
Location : Atlanta, Georgia
- Post n°28
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
I confirm Heriss' startup.
T11FearZ- Posts : 169
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 29
Location : Florida, USA
- Post n°29
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
Ok, thank you, updating tables now.
Zero- Posts : 381
Join date : 2012-05-14
Location : Illinois
- Post n°30
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
How does a blatant star bash not affect the results especially as early as lap 1 lol
Larrsauce- Posts : 546
Join date : 2012-05-18
Age : 26
Location : Canada
- Post n°31
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]Zero wrote:Mind your own business, Smokey bear
Hey, he's just trying to protect us over here!
- Spoiler:
- fk omfg it doesn't show full pic rip
Smile- Posts : 39
Join date : 2013-04-29
- Post n°32
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
Zero wrote:How does a blatant star bash not affect the results especially as early as lap 1 lol
Yup, how stupid, if you get trolled at any time, it affects you.
Fasuke- Posts : 163
Join date : 2012-05-16
Age : 31
Location : São Paulo
- Post n°33
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
T11FearZ wrote:No trolling penalty will be taken from kc2 because the troll did not seem to affect the outcome of the race, as the one who was trolled was already a good length behind from falling off the track.
I want a better explanation about that. I simple don't get why that is not considered trolling. So can I troll the guy in 8th in the next war?
Thank you.
EDIT:
My view from what happened
TK64- Posts : 522
Join date : 2012-05-13
Age : 27
Location : Washington
- Post n°35
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
A trolling penalty definitely should be happening. It was lap 1, and it put Norway back even farther than he already was so it did affect the outcome.
Fw Monk- Posts : 160
Join date : 2012-07-20
- Post n°36
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
TK64 wrote:A trolling penalty definitely should be happening. It was lap 1, and it put Norway back even farther than he already was so it did affect the outcome.
^^
i dont understand why some admins never want count cleary trolls ;9
Swag- Posts : 40
Join date : 2012-06-20
- Post n°37
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
"Crash holt die Akimbo raussssss!
norwaytm- Posts : 20
Join date : 2012-06-16
Location : Norway
- Post n°38
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
T11FearZ wrote:No trolling penalty will be taken from kc2 because the troll did not seem to affect the outcome of the race, as the one who was trolled was already a good length behind from falling off the track.
You are joking, right?
I had two whole laps to catch up before I got trolled...
Arpegio- Posts : 107
Join date : 2012-05-16
- Post n°39
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
Even if Fearz would apply it, it won't change anything : losing by 104 or 84 is barely the same thing. But I do agree to the fact that Norway could have come back.
Btw, it could be good if people who aren't part of one of the two clans who played this match just shut the fuck up (except admins).
Btw, it could be good if people who aren't part of one of the two clans who played this match just shut the fuck up (except admins).
Fw Monk- Posts : 160
Join date : 2012-07-20
- Post n°40
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
Arpegio wrote:Even if Fearz would apply it, it won't change anything : losing by 104 or 84 is barely the same thing. But I do agree to the fact that Norway could have come back.
Btw, it could be good if people who aren't part of one of the two clans who played this match just shut the fuck up (except admins).
like you did last 3 years in wcl and il? also it has nothing to do with be a part of the match , it had to do with the rules or follow rules by admins i dont care about this match since i havent played i care about admins and admins follow their owen rules
Arpegio- Posts : 107
Join date : 2012-05-16
- Post n°41
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
Fw Monk wrote:Arpegio wrote:Even if Fearz would apply it, it won't change anything : losing by 104 or 84 is barely the same thing. But I do agree to the fact that Norway could have come back.
Btw, it could be good if people who aren't part of one of the two clans who played this match just shut the fuck up (except admins).
like you did last 3 years in wcl and il? also it has nothing to do with be a part of the match , it had to do with the rules or follow rules by admins i dont care about this match since i havent played i care about admins and admins follow their owen rules
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
T11FearZ- Posts : 169
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 29
Location : Florida, USA
- Post n°42
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
I hope this helps you understand my decision
[5/5/2013 8:15:46 PM] ! Tyler/ Λν FearZ11: I didn't count it as trolling because, the way I saw it, was that either way he was going to get his next item box in 8th being quite a distance behind. I figured the item he would receive would be just as effective in the race and therefore he, theoretically, should catch up with 2 laps left to go. Had he not been bumped off before being trolled, I certainly would have counted it as trolling because he was right there with the pack. But since he fell, he would have had to play "catch up" either way, and I felt that it therefore didn't change the outcome of the race.
[5/5/2013 8:19:04 PM] Zero: yeah losing like 3+ seconds doesn't make any sort of difference
[5/5/2013 8:20:28 PM] Zero: what was i thinking!
[5/5/2013 8:20:33 PM] ! Tyler/ Λν FearZ11: he had 2 whole laps to gain that back, that's plenty of time. Had it been on the 2nd lap I may have thought differently.
[5/5/2013 8:21:00 PM] Zero: he still would have caught up to the pack a lot quicker and could have helped hit the other racers
[5/5/2013 8:21:07 PM] Zero: instead of playing catchup for longer than he needed to
[5/5/2013 8:21:12 PM] Zero: point is that's a blatant troll
[5/5/2013 8:21:30 PM] Zero: and this is a perfect example of how this rule is very subjective and wishy washy
[5/5/2013 8:21:33 PM] ! Tyler/ Λν FearZ11: but the rule isn't if it's a balant troll then points will be deducted
[5/5/2013 8:21:40 PM] Zero: plz rewrite it boshi
[5/5/2013 8:21:41 PM] Zero: thanks
[5/5/2013 8:21:54 PM] Zero: we've said enough for boshi to read
[5/5/2013 8:21:59 PM] ! Tyler/ Λν FearZ11: ^
[5/5/2013 8:22:25 PM] ! Tyler/ Λν FearZ11: I honestly feel that the rule should be changed, but until then I must follow them as closely as I can based off of my judgement
[5/5/2013 8:15:46 PM] ! Tyler/ Λν FearZ11: I didn't count it as trolling because, the way I saw it, was that either way he was going to get his next item box in 8th being quite a distance behind. I figured the item he would receive would be just as effective in the race and therefore he, theoretically, should catch up with 2 laps left to go. Had he not been bumped off before being trolled, I certainly would have counted it as trolling because he was right there with the pack. But since he fell, he would have had to play "catch up" either way, and I felt that it therefore didn't change the outcome of the race.
[5/5/2013 8:19:04 PM] Zero: yeah losing like 3+ seconds doesn't make any sort of difference
[5/5/2013 8:20:28 PM] Zero: what was i thinking!
[5/5/2013 8:20:33 PM] ! Tyler/ Λν FearZ11: he had 2 whole laps to gain that back, that's plenty of time. Had it been on the 2nd lap I may have thought differently.
[5/5/2013 8:21:00 PM] Zero: he still would have caught up to the pack a lot quicker and could have helped hit the other racers
[5/5/2013 8:21:07 PM] Zero: instead of playing catchup for longer than he needed to
[5/5/2013 8:21:12 PM] Zero: point is that's a blatant troll
[5/5/2013 8:21:30 PM] Zero: and this is a perfect example of how this rule is very subjective and wishy washy
[5/5/2013 8:21:33 PM] ! Tyler/ Λν FearZ11: but the rule isn't if it's a balant troll then points will be deducted
[5/5/2013 8:21:40 PM] Zero: plz rewrite it boshi
[5/5/2013 8:21:41 PM] Zero: thanks
[5/5/2013 8:21:54 PM] Zero: we've said enough for boshi to read
[5/5/2013 8:21:59 PM] ! Tyler/ Λν FearZ11: ^
[5/5/2013 8:22:25 PM] ! Tyler/ Λν FearZ11: I honestly feel that the rule should be changed, but until then I must follow them as closely as I can based off of my judgement
yasha- Posts : 103
Join date : 2012-07-22
- Post n°43
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
I hope you realize Fearz that even to catch up to the pack after falling off on Mg you have to do gap twice and even then you're only in the back. With getting star bashed after falling off that makes Norway's chances very slim of getting back into the race even he did get 2 goldens. The point is even missing a mt affects the outcome of a race so getting star bashed multiplies the amount of work that Norway had to do to even get close to the pack. Regardless if it barely changes anything I thought that the point of the trolling rule meant that baggers had to be careful and not run into the opposing team.
T11FearZ- Posts : 169
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 29
Location : Florida, USA
- Post n°44
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
I understand that, but how likely was it that Norway would catch all the way back up if his chances were already very slim to do so, as you said. I understand that it is a troll and if the rule is revised, I will revise my decision. I know it was a blatant troll, but there seemed to be emphasis on whether or not it affected the race outcome.
Fasuke- Posts : 163
Join date : 2012-05-16
Age : 31
Location : São Paulo
- Post n°45
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
T11FearZ wrote:I understand that, but how likely was it that Norway would catch all the way back up if his chances were already very slim to do so, as you said. I understand that it is a troll and if the rule is revised, I will revise my decision. I know it was a blatant troll, but there seemed to be emphasis on whether or not it affected the race outcome.
Losing 3+ seconds to catch up makes a LOT difference to catch up and considering it was lap 1, makes it even worse. It is kind of funny how you say he trolled but don't give him the penalty, even though all the people here seem to agree that was trolling, including one mod and one KC member (I really appreciate your honesty).
"if it doesn't change the outcome of the race" was added in case something like somebody had 8th place already and there is no way he can move to 7th and then gets trolled. No point on giving a penalty since he had 8th already and got trolled. Case completely different from this one.
Still want to know the answer for my question:
Fasuke wrote:So can I troll the guy in 8th in the next war?
Smile- Posts : 39
Join date : 2013-04-29
- Post n°46
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
T11FearZ wrote:I understand that, but how likely was it that Norway would catch all the way back up if his chances were already very slim to do so, as you said. I understand that it is a troll and if the rule is revised, I will revise my decision. I know it was a blatant troll, but there seemed to be emphasis on whether or not it affected the race outcome.
Dumbest shit I ever read. Norway got trolled on lap 1, THEREFORE placed him at an unfair advantage by losing about 6-7 seconds, this AFFECTS the whole race, doesn't matter that it's lap 1 LMAO. Pathetic how you won't implement a rule that is stamped in the rulebook here.
T11FearZ- Posts : 169
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 29
Location : Florida, USA
- Post n°47
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
Smile wrote:T11FearZ wrote:I understand that, but how likely was it that Norway would catch all the way back up if his chances were already very slim to do so, as you said. I understand that it is a troll and if the rule is revised, I will revise my decision. I know it was a blatant troll, but there seemed to be emphasis on whether or not it affected the race outcome.
Dumbest shit I ever read. Norway got trolled on lap 1, THEREFORE placed him at an unfair advantage by losing about 6-7 seconds, this AFFECTS the whole race, doesn't matter that it's lap 1 LMAO. Pathetic how you won't implement a rule that is stamped in the rulebook here.
I appreciate your opinion, but insulting me will not change my opinion.
T11FearZ- Posts : 169
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 29
Location : Florida, USA
- Post n°48
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
Fasuke wrote:T11FearZ wrote:I understand that, but how likely was it that Norway would catch all the way back up if his chances were already very slim to do so, as you said. I understand that it is a troll and if the rule is revised, I will revise my decision. I know it was a blatant troll, but there seemed to be emphasis on whether or not it affected the race outcome.
Losing 3+ seconds to catch up makes a LOT difference to catch up and considering it was lap 1, makes it even worse. It is kind of funny how you say he trolled but don't give him the penalty, even though all the people here seem to agree that was trolling, including one mod and one KC member (I really appreciate your honesty).
"if it doesn't change the outcome of the race" was added in case something like somebody had 8th place already and there is no way he can move to 7th and then gets trolled. No point on giving a penalty since he had 8th already and got trolled. Case completely different from this one.
I feel differently, being only lap 1, the difference in time makes it less effective because there is still a lot of time to catch up and use items that are very effective in doing so. Had it been lap 2 it would have definitely affected the outcome significantly.
And I understand the differences in the circumstances, which is why I'm reconsidering, I just don't see how the troll made such the huge difference you talk about because he surely would have had time to catch up. If you don't mind me asking, what position did he finish that race? I realize his position will not completely reflect the effect of the troll because of the 2 laps separating the troll and the finish of the race, but I am curious.
Still want to know the answer for my question:Fasuke wrote:So can I troll the guy in 8th in the next war?
You can do what you want, though that does not guarantee whether or not a penalty will be implemented.
InsaneisEpic- Posts : 20
Join date : 2012-05-14
Age : 26
Location : Ontario
- Post n°49
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
yasha wrote:-100 for what? For doing something within the rules of this league? Go beg for attention in D4, where you belong.
Actually Ap has been penalized 100 points for doing this before so Smoke does have a point (having 1 player play on both teams within the same scheduled week) so just because we are a lower tier clan means we get disrespected more and higher clans get sugarcoated and get multiple chances when they are blatant going around the rules. I wouldnt have said anything about this but since this exact situation has happened before, shouldnt the same penalty be applied.
This community is so corrupt. If you're a high tier player you can just cheat whenever the hell you want and get away with it, yet when your you're in a lower division 1 bit of luck and BAM you're instantly suspicious.
Last part is just a useless rant
EDIT: it was WCL so nvm
Fasuke- Posts : 163
Join date : 2012-05-16
Age : 31
Location : São Paulo
- Post n°50
Re: [W1] - ¢β2 314 vs 418 ĸ¢
T11FearZ wrote:Fasuke wrote:T11FearZ wrote:I understand that, but how likely was it that Norway would catch all the way back up if his chances were already very slim to do so, as you said. I understand that it is a troll and if the rule is revised, I will revise my decision. I know it was a blatant troll, but there seemed to be emphasis on whether or not it affected the race outcome.
Losing 3+ seconds to catch up makes a LOT difference to catch up and considering it was lap 1, makes it even worse. It is kind of funny how you say he trolled but don't give him the penalty, even though all the people here seem to agree that was trolling, including one mod and one KC member (I really appreciate your honesty).
"if it doesn't change the outcome of the race" was added in case something like somebody had 8th place already and there is no way he can move to 7th and then gets trolled. No point on giving a penalty since he had 8th already and got trolled. Case completely different from this one.
I feel differently, being only lap 1, the difference in time makes it less effective because there is still a lot of time to catch up and use items that are very effective in doing so. Had it been lap 2 it would have definitely affected the outcome significantly.
And I understand the differences in the circumstances, which is why I'm reconsidering, I just don't see how the troll made such the huge difference you talk about because he surely would have had time to catch up. If you don't mind me asking, what position did he finish that race? I realize his position will not completely reflect the effect of the troll because of the 2 laps separating the troll and the finish of the race, but I am curious.
Still want to know the answer for my question:Fasuke wrote:So can I troll the guy in 8th in the next war?
You can do what you want, though that does not guarantee whether or not a penalty will be implemented.
He got 6th because he passed 2 people who got gorged. If that wasn't the 3 ~ 6 seconds he lost because of the troll, he would've gotten 3rd(ofc items would have changed and some other things could've happened).
Oh, so please explain me, what is the difference between me trolling someone in 8th, lap1, something that will probably result in a penalty, from this case? It would have been 2 similar cases and 2 different decisions.
Thank you.
|
|