I have another question, who nominate players to be watched and voted into the council, in order to put them on the conditional list ?
Because anyway, I think it's a bad idea to do that for players when there is no suspicious proof ( videos ).
Let’s take an example : what if I ask to council to vote for an unknown player from the major part of the community, from a small clan, which plays in division 18, which nobody cares about and doesn't look who is playing in ? This player is a real hacker, but atm he can't be caught on a video to prove it. So he is a real hacker, but nobody knows him. So the council who didn't know anything about him will vote “no” because they don't have any opinion about him. But if some council members did their job in a better way, wanting to get to know him they could ask to friends what do they know about him, if they like him, etc. They will say he doesn't hack, except if they have some personal issues with him or are hater from his team, then in this case they will say he probably hacks.
What I’m trying to explain is : the way this list is done can't be good, because it's only from biased/personal opinion and not from facts ( proves, videos, or anything who is really true ). The votes “yes” and “no" are only here for what you really think of this player. So it can only be an error to apply a rule or make a list based on this.
If players think someone is hacking, and there is nothing against him and he is not in the conditional list, then it's you who have to record what you will see and show to the community what is suspicious or what you think is hack. Until that, you can't oblige a player to prove he is not hacking, but you can ask him and he can accept or not. He can also prove by himself he is not hacking if it's a problem for him being accused.
I give you another example from IRL ( because I know a lot of people like comparing video games’ rules to IRL rules
) : if you think your neighbor killed someone and still have the body in his house ( because some of your other neighbors told you that ), you can't go to the police and oblige him to open his house and to prove he has no dead body there, without any proof of what you’re saying.
Well, I hope you all now understand what I meant. And I hope all players concerned who have been put on that list because of "suspicions", will be removed.