[W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Share
    avatar
    Zero

    Posts : 381
    Join date : 2012-05-14
    Location : Illinois

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by Zero on Tue May 28, 2013 11:40 pm

    IMO that's what division admins are here for, to make decisions on things like this that aren't clearly outlined in the rules. Otherwise we would be useless and they could just call us the Table Update People. Wink
    avatar
    Tweek

    Posts : 167
    Join date : 2012-05-10

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by Tweek on Tue May 28, 2013 11:58 pm

    Yes but I won't accept a 11 races war, they don't want to count GV race cause ac got top4 by glitching. What I would really like to see is a redone GP3 with no trolling or glitching but both teams would have to agree with it and since ac don't really care I don't think it would happen.


    _________________
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    avatar
    Brian

    Posts : 172
    Join date : 2013-01-19
    Age : 57
    Location : dsdf

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by Brian on Wed May 29, 2013 12:14 am

    I think the glitching penalty should come from the players' individual score, so that stuff like this won't happen (glitch on GV and get 15pts for your individuals for free), just my thoughts.


    _________________
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    Credits to the almighty Gus.

    Phil

    Posts : 197
    Join date : 2012-07-29
    Age : 66

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by Phil on Wed May 29, 2013 5:47 am

    To be honest, I expected and still are expecting the DQ of ac.
    It's one thing not to take IL wars serious and having fun in IL. It's another to imbalance a whole season (by shifting the +/- to a max.) because of ac's goofy behaviour in this war. In addition to their constant need to reschedule every match.

    f. Teams who are unable to war on the scheduled date/time twice or more during a season may be disqualified or replaced for the following season.

    Ac's themselves and IL staff really should rethink if this league still is the right place for them. To me, reliability is a must-have for every participating team. And it really hurts to see a team who thinks they can screw around with their opponents by rescheduling every war to their advantage. And then fuck around with them during the match, while other teams struggle to have five players on sunday on their set time to give their oponnents a good challenge.
    avatar
    Fabe

    Posts : 145
    Join date : 2012-05-13
    Location : Belgium

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by Fabe on Wed May 29, 2013 8:00 am

    Tweek wrote:Yes but I won't accept a 11 races war, they don't want to count GV race cause ac got top4 by glitching. What I would really like to see is a redone GP3 with no trolling or glitching but both teams would have to agree with it and since ac don't really care I don't think it would happen.

    After the GV race we resetted and played 3 races (the final 3 from gp1, where bc64 is the first race of that gp), we played 12 races in total, 13 if you count the GV, my table is all results without the GV race, ac's table is with the GV race and not the MG. Sorry but we're not redoing the third gp, leave it like it is then, with ac's table.

    I honestly thought using my table was the best thing to do, for everyone, now with this +/-, if we ever tie, perhaps for the division title, we win no doubt with those scores, and that only cause of counting a glitched race.
    avatar
    ~vooky~

    Posts : 255
    Join date : 2012-05-14
    Age : 20
    Location : Germany

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by ~vooky~ on Wed May 29, 2013 8:53 am

    WCL > IL
    avatar
    Tweek

    Posts : 167
    Join date : 2012-05-10

    [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by Tweek on Wed May 29, 2013 9:18 am

    I asked if 13 races were played and you said no, I already wanted to do that but thought only 12 had been played. I'll have to count an easy 5v2 race but it'll be for the best.

    I'll edit topic but I'll update tables later.

    Edit: Done.


    _________________
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    avatar
    5olaaar

    Posts : 129
    Join date : 2012-11-05
    Location : macka's bogan village

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by 5olaaar on Thu May 30, 2013 2:07 am

    umad phil

    xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
    avatar
    5olaaar

    Posts : 129
    Join date : 2012-11-05
    Location : macka's bogan village

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by 5olaaar on Thu May 30, 2013 2:13 am

    oh yea, i don't think we care about our individuals.

    we donate all our points to av.
    avatar
    Veil

    Posts : 437
    Join date : 2012-10-23
    Age : 17
    Location : Singapore

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by Veil on Thu May 30, 2013 2:26 am

    Phil definitely have a point there.
    avatar
    Brian

    Posts : 172
    Join date : 2013-01-19
    Age : 57
    Location : dsdf

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by Brian on Thu May 30, 2013 8:59 am

    Just don't agree to reschedule with them anymore. If they can't play at normal match time, take the free-win. Their attitude is poor enough.


    _________________
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    Credits to the almighty Gus.
    avatar
    5olaaar

    Posts : 129
    Join date : 2012-11-05
    Location : macka's bogan village

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by 5olaaar on Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:19 am

    bump

    nSindi

    Posts : 111
    Join date : 2012-06-01
    Age : 20

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by nSindi on Wed Oct 23, 2013 8:01 am

    LOL


    _________________
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    Sponsored content

    Re: [W4] - n§ 448 vs 256 ac

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Jun 25, 2017 10:46 pm